Factory vs Freelancer

          The difference lies in the responsibility and scope of implementing quality assurance principles. As an owner of a chocolate bar factory, I, along with team leaders, would help navigate several qualified teams in conducting quality assurance principles throughout the factory. Since it is a collection of employees, their contributions would support one another, addressing almost every aspect of quality assurance principle given that each employee is solving the same challenge. The process is also more efficient to have multiple employees collude with the intent to solve the issue, assuming each employee are dependent on each other. As long as every challenge and solution is documented, this system of employees implementing quality assurance principles is relatively efficient and productive. There is also how much dedication there is to ensure the implementation of all quality assurance principles. As an owner, it would be in my best interest to implement as much quality assurance as possible for my company to strive.
          However, as a freelance software guru, there is only myself to carry out the quality assurance principles, lacking the qualified assets that would assist me. There is also the potential I would be unable to address every single quality assurance principle for my program due to the lack of testers to reveal unforeseen glitches and bugs. Given that the software guru is an average programmer with sufficient skill in each field of the programming stages, there could be an imbalance in qualifications. For example, software security could be the stronger suit of the software programmer whereas exception handling could be less efficiently implemented. The responsibilities of a software guru is relatively large on a general scale, consisting of several smaller tasks.